Eustace v. State

Full title: KYLE EUSTACE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 4, 2018

242 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17–2465

05-04-2018

Kyle EUSTACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Paula C. Coffman and Jeffrey D. Deen, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Orlando, and Lori D. Loftis, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Paula C. Coffman and Jeffrey D. Deen, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Orlando, and Lori D. Loftis, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.