From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eubanks v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 1978
245 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

55823.

SUBMITTED MAY 4, 1978.

DECIDED JUNE 6, 1978.

Fraud, etc. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Lambros.

John Genins, for appellant.

Cotton, Katz, White Palmer, J. Timothy White, Kenneth Gartlir, Macey Zusmann, James W. Penland, Long, Weinberg, Ansley Wheeler, Charles M. Goetz, Jr., Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd Cadenhead, Paul M. Talmadge, Jr., for appellees.


1. This is an appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim for fraud upon which relief can be granted. In view of the new rule announced in Cochran v. McCollum, 233 Ga. 104 ( 210 S.E.2d 13) (1974), this court is unable to affirm the judgment below but must reverse with direction to sustain the motions as for more definite statement, as outlined in Tucker, v. Chung Studio of Karate, 142 Ga. App. 818, 819 (3) ( 237 S.E.2d 223) (1977).

2. The counterclaims alleging that the complaint was filed and is being used wilfully and maliciously for improper purposes and without probable cause should have been dismissed on plaintiff's motion therefor since they are premature. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Pearce, 121 Ga. App. 835 ( 175 S.E.2d 910) (1970); Prairieland Broadcasters v. Thompson, 135 Ga. App. 73, 74 (3) ( 217 S.E.2d 296) (1975).

Judgment reversed with direction. Quillian, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

SUBMITTED MAY 4, 1978 — DECIDED JUNE 6, 1978.


Summaries of

Eubanks v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 1978
245 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Eubanks v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:EUBANKS v. DAVIS et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 6, 1978

Citations

245 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
245 S.E.2d 495

Citing Cases

Eubanks v. Davis

Following the rule set out in Cochran v. McCollum, 233 Ga. 104 ( 210 S.E.2d 13) (1974), we remanded and…