Ethanol Boosting Sys. v. Ford Motor Co.

Full title: ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

2020-1472 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2020)

Opinion

2020-1472

12-11-2020

ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

ANDRES HEALY, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, STEVEN M. SEIGEL; WILLIAM DANIEL O'CONNELL, New York, NY. MICHAEL S. CONNOR, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KIRK T. BRADLEY; NATALIE CHRISTINE CLAYTON, ANDREW JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY; BRIAN DAVID HILL, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, Westfield, NJ.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:19-cv-00196-CFC-SRF, Judge Colm F. Connolly.

JUDGMENT

ANDRES HEALY, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, STEVEN M. SEIGEL; WILLIAM DANIEL O'CONNELL, New York, NY. MICHAEL S. CONNOR, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KIRK T. BRADLEY; NATALIE CHRISTINE CLAYTON, ANDREW JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY; BRIAN DAVID HILL, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, Westfield, NJ. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court