From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etchison v. McGuire

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1908
61 S.E. 196 (N.C. 1908)

Opinion

(Filed 17 April, 1908.)

Appeal and Error — Order Making Parties — No Prejudice to Appellant Appearing — Premature Appeal.

Orders of the lower court making additional parties to an action are usually discretionary, and an appeal therefrom will be dismissed as prematurely taken when it does not appear in what manner the rights of the appellant are prejudiced.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Justice, J., at Spring Term, 1907, of DAVIE.

T. B. Bailey and A. T. Grant, Jr., for plaintiff.

Watson, Buxton Watson and E. L. Gaither for defendant.


The plaintiffs except to and appeal from an order of Justice, J., at September Term, 1907, of DAVIE, directing that W. A. Bailey be made a party defendant and that a summons issue, returnable to the following term. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal in this Court upon the ground that it is premature and we are of opinion that, under the authorities, the motion must be allowed.

There may be cases, where the injury to a party's right is (389) manifest, in which this Court will entertain such an appeal, but the wrong done these plaintiffs by the order has not been made plain to us. The Court has said: "It can very rarely happen that making an additional party will be a serious prejudice, and hence such orders are usually discretionary and not reviewable." Bernard v. Shemwell, 139 N.C. 447; Tillery v. Candler, 118 N.C. 889, and cases cited; The Code, sec. 273.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Etchison v. McGuire

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1908
61 S.E. 196 (N.C. 1908)
Case details for

Etchison v. McGuire

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. JOHN.W. ETCHISON ET AL. v. JAMES McGUIRE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1908

Citations

61 S.E. 196 (N.C. 1908)
147 N.C. 388

Citing Cases

Trust Co. v. Whitehurst

STACY, C. J. As no harm has come to the plaintiff from the order directing that the receiver of the payee…

Raleigh v. Edwards

This conclusion has explicit support in well considered decisions recognizing and enforcing the specific rule…