From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ESTY v. McDONOUGH

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 1, 2007
Case No.: 3:04cv363/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)

Summary

stating lack of counsel or ignorance of procedure does not alone constitute cause

Summary of this case from Broughton v. Crews

Opinion

Case No.: 3:04cv363/MCR/EMT.

May 1, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 1, 2006. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

ESTY v. McDONOUGH

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 1, 2007
Case No.: 3:04cv363/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)

stating lack of counsel or ignorance of procedure does not alone constitute cause

Summary of this case from Broughton v. Crews
Case details for

ESTY v. McDONOUGH

Case Details

Full title:SEAN P. ESTY, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

Case No.: 3:04cv363/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 1, 2007)

Citing Cases

Esty v. Jones

(Ex. F). The evidence presented at trial is fully laid out in this court's order (which incorporated the…

Broughton v. Crews

Petitioner fails to any identify any external factor — for any of his claims, in the Memorandum, Reply, or…