From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. Orena

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1880
54 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1880)

Opinion

         Appeal from an order changing the place of trial, in the First District Court, County of San Luis Obispo. Fawcett, J.

         COUNSEL:

         W. J. & Wm. Graves, and Ernest Graves, for Appellant.

          Albert Packard, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         Department No. 2, by the Court:

         This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial from the District Court of San Luis Obispo County to the District Court of Santa Barbara County.

         On the 16th of July, 1879, defendant filed his answer; also, an affidavit of merits for change of place of trial. On the same day he gave to the attorneys of plaintiff notice of motion for the first Monday of September, 1879, to change the place of trial, upon the ground that San Luis Obispo County was not the proper county for the trial of the cause. He made no demand in writing that the trial be had in the proper county. Such demand in writing must be made. Notice of the motion is not such a demand as is required by § 396, Code of Civil Procedure.

         Order reversed.


Summaries of

Estrada v. Orena

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1880
54 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1880)
Case details for

Estrada v. Orena

Case Details

Full title:ESTRADA v. ORENA

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1880

Citations

54 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1880)

Citing Cases

Warner v. Warner

A notice of motion to change the place of trial on the ground of residence of defendant is not a demand in…

Pennie v. Visher

We think the grounds specified for a change of the place of trial insufficient; and were they not, there does…