Opinion
CA 19-02063 CA 19-02296 CA 19-02297 CA 19-02298
05-28-2021
ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 4.)
PRESENT:
Appellant having moved to vacate the dismissal of the appeal taken herein from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), (denominated a motion to extend the time to perfect), for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the same court entered December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), for a stay of proceedings, and for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motions are denied.
Entered: May 28, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court