From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estaco v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 26, 2023
No. 16744-23W (U.S.T.C. Oct. 26, 2023)

Opinion

16744-23W

10-26-2023

EDGAR A. DAMAS ESTACO, Petitioner(s) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On September 20, 2023, petitioner filed redacted and unredacted versions of a Petition to commence this whistleblower case pursuant to Internal Revenue Code section 7623.

The parties are reminded that, under Rule 345(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, in a filing with the Court in a whistleblower action, the party making the filing "shall refrain from including, or shall take appropriate steps to redact, the name, address, and other identifying information of the taxpayer to whom the claim relates." Rule 345(b) further provides that the party "filing a document that contains redacted information shall file under seal a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed."

Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced unredacted Petition is sealed from public view and it shall be retained by the Court in a sealed file which shall not be inspected by any person or entity not a party to this case, except by an Order of the Court. It is further

ORDERED that in the future, when filing or lodging documents that are not sealed, the parties shall refrain from including, or take appropriate steps to redact the name, address, and other identifying information of the target taxpayer and, when appropriate, either (1) concurrently file or lodge under seal a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed or (2) concurrently Docket No. 16744-23W Page 2 of file or lodge under seal an unredacted version of any redacted document that is filed or lodged. Documents that are to be filed under seal must be submitted to the Court in paper form.

If utilizing the first method, the parties shall file or lodge redacted versions of documents accompanied by a reference list of redacted information, which must be filed or lodged under seal and specifically identify and state each item of redacted information (for example, when the target taxpayer's name is redacted, the reference list must identify that redaction and also state the target taxpayer's name). Subsequent references in the case to a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information.

If utilizing the second method, the versions shall be clearly marked as "Unredacted" or "Redacted", as appropriate, and the redacted version shall be an exact duplicate of the corresponding unredacted version, including attachments and exhibits, except for the redactions made with respect to the identifying information of the target taxpayer.


Summaries of

Estaco v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 26, 2023
No. 16744-23W (U.S.T.C. Oct. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Estaco v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR A. DAMAS ESTACO, Petitioner(s) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 26, 2023

Citations

No. 16744-23W (U.S.T.C. Oct. 26, 2023)