From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. Time Motor Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1982
88 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

June 1, 1982


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated November 20, 1981, which denied their motion to amend their complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiffs' time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Since there was no showing of prejudice to defendants indicating that they had been hindered in preparing their case or prevented from taking some measure in support of their position, the motion to amend the complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause should have been granted (see Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 N.Y.2d 18). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Esposito v. Time Motor Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1982
88 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Esposito v. Time Motor Sales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT ESPOSITO et al., Appellants, v. TIME MOTOR SALES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Saldivar v. I.J. White Corp.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with…

Rutkowski v. Geist

Defendant is granted leave to conduct a further physical examination of plaintiff Patricia Rutkowski, if he…