From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. Hollander

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Mar 18, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-728-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-728-FtM-29SPC.

March 18, 2010


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Ralph H. Esposito, Jr.'s Motion to Issue a Subpoena (Doc. #40) filed on March 8, 2010. The Plaintiff moves the Court to issue a subpoena upon the non-party Jennifer Lee Kranites.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 details the process of issuing subpoenas upon non-parties. The Plaintiff appears to know that a subpoena is issued pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45, as he attached a copy of the rule to his Motion. However, the Plaintiff's Motion does not comply with Rule 45. The Plaintiff is reminded that despite his pro se status, it is mandatory that he proceed in accordance with the Federal and Local Rules. Loren v Sasser, 309 F.3d 1296, 1304 (11th Cir. 2002) (holding that even pro se parties must follow procedures). Because the Motion is deficient and not in compliance with the Federal and Local Rules, it is due to be denied.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Plaintiff, Ralph H. Esposito, Jr.'s Motion to Issue a Subpoena (Doc. #40) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

Esposito v. Hollander

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Mar 18, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-728-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Esposito v. Hollander

Case Details

Full title:RALPH H. ESPOSITO, JR., Plaintiff, v. RICHARD HOLLANDER; EDWARD MILLER…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-728-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 18, 2010)