From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escobedo v. Hanford Chinese Kitchen, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2015
1:15-cv-00879-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          Tanya E. Moore, MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., San Jose, California Attorney for Plaintiff, Jose Escobedo.

          ROBERT M. DOWD, MARIO U. ZAMORA, GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, L.L.P. Hanford, CA Attorneys for Defendants, Hanford Chinese Kitchen, LLC; Augustine Keng-Hou Wu, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006; and Wah Wong Wu, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006.


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

          SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, JOSE ESCOBEDO ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, HANFORD CHINESE KITCHEN, LLC; AUGUSTINE KENG-HOU WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006; and WAH WONG WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006 (collectively "Defendants, " and together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. A Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this matter for September 10, 2015;

         2. On September 9, 2015, Defendants provided a Certified Access Specialist ("CASp") Report to Plaintiff for the purpose of resolving Plaintiff's equitable claims. Plaintiff has not yet had the opportunity to review the report;

         3. The Parties had also previously agreed to a site inspection of the subject property on September 10, 2015; however, the inspection must be rescheduled to allow Plaintiff time to review the CASp report;

         4. The parties based the dates originally proposed in the Joint Scheduling Report on the date of the site inspection;

         5. The Parties wish to explore settlement before incurring the fees and costs associated with both the site inspection and the Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources where an independent settlement may be reached without the need for the site inspection or the Scheduling Conference; therefore,

         6. The Parties agree that the Scheduling Conference may be continued from September 10, 2015 to November 19, 2015 at 10:15 a.m.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference currently set for September 10, 2015 is hereby continued to November 19, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8 before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties are to file an updated Joint Scheduling Report at least seven days prior to the conference.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Escobedo v. Hanford Chinese Kitchen, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2015
1:15-cv-00879-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Escobedo v. Hanford Chinese Kitchen, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ESCOBEDO, Plaintiff, v. HANFORD CHINESE KITCHEN, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-00879-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2015)