From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ernst v. Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1950
277 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

November 13, 1950.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.


In a separation action, judgment modified on the law by striking therefrom the sixth ordering paragraph relating to payment of a counsel fee. As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The allowance for counsel fee was improperly incorporated in the judgment because it is remuneration for past services. ( Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N.Y. 402; Stevens v. Stevens, 214 App. Div. 785; Fisher v. Fisher, 223 App. Div. 19.)


Summaries of

Ernst v. Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1950
277 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Ernst v. Ernst

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH ERNST, Respondent, v. FRANK ERNST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Furman v. Furman

On applications made during the pendency of a matrimonial action, counsel fees are awarded to enable the wife…

Christensen v. Christensen

With regard to counsel fees, plaintiff made no application therefor prior to the conclusion of the trial.…