From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erie Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-31

In the Matter of ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF Renee E. WISER, petitioner-respondent, v. Andrew R. THOMPSON, respondent-appellant.

Charles J. Greenberg, Buffalo, for respondent-appellant. John S. Cipolla, Buffalo, for petitioner-respondent.


Charles J. Greenberg, Buffalo, for respondent-appellant. John S. Cipolla, Buffalo, for petitioner-respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act based on respondent father's alleged willful violation of a child support order. The Support Magistrate entered an order in favor of petitioner upon the father's alleged default. We conclude that Family Court erred in denying the father's objections to a second order of the Support Magistrate, which denied the motion of the father to vacate the order entered upon his alleged default. The father's “failure to appear at the fact-finding hearing ... ‘does not automatically constitute a default,’ in view of the fact that the attorney for the [father] appeared on [his] behalf and requested an adjournment” ( Matter of Isaiah H., 61 A.D.3d 1372, 1373, 877 N.Y.S.2d 786; see Matter of David A.A. v. Maryann A., 41 A.D.3d 1300, 837 N.Y.S.2d 479; Matter of Shemeco D., 265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799). “A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” ( Matter of Sales v. Gisendaner, 272 A.D.2d 997, 997, 707 N.Y.S.2d 562).

We therefore reverse the order, grant the objections to the order of the Support Magistrate entered August 16, 2010 and grant the motion to vacate the order of the Support Magistrate entered June 19, 2009, and we remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings on the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the objections to the order of the Support Magistrate entered August 16, 2010 are granted and the motion to vacate the order of the Support Magistrate entered June 19, 2009 is granted, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, and GORSKI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Erie Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Erie Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 1327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 600
937 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Daniels v. Davis

We further agree with respondent that Family Court erred in disposing of the matter on the basis of…

Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Nicole C. (In re Matter of Cameron B.)

We agree with the mother that the court erred in disposing of the matter on the basis of her purported…