From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Epps v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 23, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-23-2015

In the Matter of Cory EPPS, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Cory Epps, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel), for respondent.


Cory Epps, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, in the form of the misbehavior report, hearing testimony and positive urinalysis test results, supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bussey v. Commissioner of Corr. & Community Supervision, 120 A.D.3d 1471, 1472, 991 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2014] ; Matter of Hyzer v. Fischer, 104 A.D.3d 983, 983, 960 N.Y.S.2d 275 [2013] ). The request for urinalysis form and testimony of the correction officers involved further established that there was an unbroken chain of custody over the sample (see Matter of Bussey v. Commissioner of Corr. & Community Supervision, 120 A.D.3d at 1472, 991 N.Y.S.2d 913 ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent they are properly before us, have been considered and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY, ROSE and LYNCH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Epps v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 23, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Epps v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cory EPPS, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 23, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 1477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
127 A.D.3d 1477
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3424

Citing Cases

Rodari v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of its author, together with the positive…

Ralands v. Prack

es ( Matter of Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft Bd., 66 N.Y.2d 298, 303, 496 N.Y.S.2d 979,…