From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eolas Techs. Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 22, 2013
521 F. App'x 928 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1632

07-22-2013

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., and YAHOO! INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND GOOGLE INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, AND J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

MIKE MCKOOL JR., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY, of Dallas, Texas, and KEVIN L. BURGESS, JOHN B. CAMPBELL and JOEL L. THOLLANDER, of Austin, Texas. DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was ADAM CONRAD, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc., et al.; DIANE K. LETTELLEIR, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Plano, Texas, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, and JENNIFER H. DOAN, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, Texas, for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; KEVIN T. KRAMER, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellee, Amazon.com, Inc.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0446, Chief Judge Leonard Davis.

JUDGMENT

MIKE MCKOOL JR., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY, of Dallas, Texas, and KEVIN L. BURGESS, JOHN B. CAMPBELL and JOEL L. THOLLANDER, of Austin, Texas.

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was ADAM CONRAD, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc., et al.; DIANE K. LETTELLEIR, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Plano, Texas, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, and JENNIFER H. DOAN, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, Texas, for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; KEVIN T. KRAMER, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellee, Amazon.com, Inc. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk


Summaries of

Eolas Techs. Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 22, 2013
521 F. App'x 928 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Eolas Techs. Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 22, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 928 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Eolas Techs. Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

The Court previously construed terms in patents related to the '507 Patent in Eolas Technologies, Inc. v.…

Sunoco Partners Mktg. & Terminals v. U.S. Venture, Inc.

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, the court finds that USV necessarily obtained videotaped…