Opinion
Submitted November 30, 1992
Decided February 16, 1993
Motion by the State defendants, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court's order denying their motion for leave to renew, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted. Motion for leave to appeal by the City defendants granted.
Judge SMITH taking no part.