From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Empire Beef Co., v. Meyners-Robinson Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

holding that long-arm jurisdiction existed where plaintiff's product was "loaded onto defendant's trucks in Rochester for immediate delivery outside the State"

Summary of this case from Energy Brands, Inc. v. Jorgensen

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Summary Judgment.)

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion denied, complaint reinstated, motion granted in part and first and second affirmative defenses dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the cross motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (see, CPLR 302 [a] [1]). Defendant is a Florida corporation that contracted with plaintiff, a New York corporation, for the purchase of 42,000 pounds of veal "F.O.B. Rochester". Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the agreed price of the veal.

In Katz Son Billiard Prods. v. Correale Sons ( 26 A.D.2d 52, 53, affd 20 N.Y.2d 903), it was held that a New Jersey defendant did not transact business in New York within the meaning of the long-arm statute by accepting delivery of goods shipped to New Jersey "F.O.B. [plaintiff's] factory in New York City" (see also, Dulman v. Potomac Baking Co., 85 A.D.2d 676, 677). In Katz, however, defendant never entered New York, and delivery was by a common carrier. In this case, the meat was loaded onto defendant's trucks in Rochester for immediate delivery outside the State.

CPLR 302 (a) (1) "is a 'single act statute' and proof of one transaction in New York is sufficient to invoke jurisdiction * * * so long as the defendant's activities here were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transaction and the claim asserted" (Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp., 71 N.Y.2d 460, 467). By sending its trucks to Rochester and taking delivery of the meat there, defendant transacted business in New York within the meaning of the statute (see, Kaddis Mfg. Corp. v. Gil-Bar Rubber Prods. Co., 103 A.D.2d 1010).


Summaries of

Empire Beef Co., v. Meyners-Robinson Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

holding that long-arm jurisdiction existed where plaintiff's product was "loaded onto defendant's trucks in Rochester for immediate delivery outside the State"

Summary of this case from Energy Brands, Inc. v. Jorgensen

finding that "[b]y sending its trucks to Rochester and taking delivery of the meat there, defendant transacted business in New York within the meaning of the statute"

Summary of this case from Diaz v. Sol Melia, S.A.
Case details for

Empire Beef Co., v. Meyners-Robinson Co.

Case Details

Full title:EMPIRE BEEF COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 998

Citing Cases

Krys v. Aaron (In re Refco Inc. Sec. Litig.)

The fact that Feighery participated in some meetings by phone rather than personally does not detract from a…

Energy Brands, Inc. v. Jorgensen

Those acts satisfy New York's long-arm jurisdiction where, as here, the causes of action arises out of a…