From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emerson v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)

Opinion

NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY

02-07-2013

TINA EMERSON ADC #710724 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

Plaintiff's statements in her objections [doc.#11] to the recommended denial of her motion for injunction (due to legal mail delays) that she "do[es] not think I can continue" and is "exhausted" appears to relate, at least in part, to her statement that she is "bogged down with litigation up to my ears" and that she does not think she can continue without an attorney or assistance.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for an injunction (docket entry #2) is DENIED.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Emerson v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Emerson v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:TINA EMERSON ADC #710724 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

NO: 5:12CV00449 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)