From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ely v. Lempke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 11, 2013
No. 09 Civ. 5836 (RA) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 09 Civ. 5836 (RA) (HBP)

02-11-2013

LANCE ELY, Petitioner, v. JOHN B. LEMPKE, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

The Court hereby adopts the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pitman, dated October 18, 2012, to which no objection has been filed. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. The parties' failure to file written objections, after Judge Pitman warned that such failure would result in a waiver of objections and would preclude appellate review, precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601 (2d Cir. 2008). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2013

New York, New York

_________________________

Ronnie Abrams

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ely v. Lempke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 11, 2013
No. 09 Civ. 5836 (RA) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Ely v. Lempke

Case Details

Full title:LANCE ELY, Petitioner, v. JOHN B. LEMPKE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

No. 09 Civ. 5836 (RA) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2013)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Kirkpatrick

But upon a review of the record, I cannot disagree with the Appellate Division's conclusion that "most of…