From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1989
153 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

September 28, 1989


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, and insofar as it seeks reargument or clarification granted only to the extent of amending the memorandum decision of this court filed herein by deleting the period at the end of the majority's memorandum decision [ 153 A.D.2d 501] and adding "as well as minus the closing costs incurred by defendants in connection with the sale to the CBS-Hines joint venture".

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1989
153 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Elmsmere Associates v. Gladstone

Case Details

Full title:ELMSMERE ASSOCIATES v. GLADSTONE

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1989

Citations

153 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
545 N.Y.S.2d 333

Citing Cases

Sweeney v. Waitz

"Factors to be considered in determining whether the owner has ‘abused the privilege of doing business in the…

Strojmaterialintorg v. Russian Am. Com.

Rather, a plaintiff must allege specific facts showing that the shareholder or officer is doing business in…