From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellison v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 17, 1934
156 So. 123 (Fla. 1934)

Opinion

Opinion Filed July 17, 1934.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Lafayette County, Hal W. Adams, Judge.

W. P. Chavous, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of the larceny of one bull, the property of one W. J. Winburn.

The evidence as to the identity and ownership of the animal killed, butchered and sold by the plaintiffs in error is entirely unsatisfactory and unconvincing. It does not measure up to that degree of proof which is required to establish guilt. At best, it could only be sufficient to create suspicion that the plaintiffs in error were guilty of the offense charged.

The judgment should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial awarded. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

DAVIS, C. J., and TERRELL, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Ellison v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 17, 1934
156 So. 123 (Fla. 1934)
Case details for

Ellison v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ELLISON and WILEY ELLISON v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jul 17, 1934

Citations

156 So. 123 (Fla. 1934)
156 So. 123

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

The evidence here creates a strong suspicion of guilt, but a mere suspicion, no matter how great, does not…