From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellison et al. v. Bank of Meeker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1911
117 P. 199 (Okla. 1911)

Opinion

No. 666

Opinion Filed January 10, 1911.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Review — Verdict — Sufficiency of Evidence. Syllabus same as paragraph 3 of the syllabus in Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 P. 10.

Error from District Court, Lincoln County; W. N. Maben, Judge.

Action by the Bank of Meeker against V. S. Ellison and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

Roy Hoffman and J. B. A. Robertson, for plaintiffs in error.

Edgar N. Sweet, S.D. Decker, and V. S. Decker, for defendant in error.


The note sued upon by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, was non-negotiable. All defenses that were permissible between the original parties are still available. The issues of fact were submitted under proper instructions, and the verdict of the jury, as approved by the trial court in overruling the motion for new trial, there being substantial evidence to support the same, is conclusive on this court. Ft. Smith Western R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 P. 10.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

All the Justices, concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.


Summaries of

Ellison et al. v. Bank of Meeker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1911
117 P. 199 (Okla. 1911)
Case details for

Ellison et al. v. Bank of Meeker

Case Details

Full title:ELLISON et al. v. BANK OF MEEKER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 10, 1911

Citations

117 P. 199 (Okla. 1911)
117 P. 199

Citing Cases

St. L. S. F. R. Co. v. Young

There was some, without a doubt. In such case it is proper to submit the issue to a jury, and it is not the…

Edwards v. Miller

roduced by both parties on the subject, and the jury by its general verdict found that the said note had not…