From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Mueller

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 23, 1960
280 F.2d 722 (D.C. Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 15599.

Argued June 10, 1960.

Decided June 23, 1960.

Mr. Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Anthony F. Cafferky, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Mr. Kevin T. Maroney, Atty., Dept. of Justice, was on the brief, for appellees.

Before WASHINGTON, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant's dismissal was the subject of an extensive hearing before the Civil Service Commission under the Veterans' Preference Act of 1944, 5 U.S.C.A. § 863, and was upheld by that body. Suit for a declaratory judgment and restoration of status was thereafter brought in the District Court. That court granted the appellees' (defendants') motion for summary judgment.

The function of the courts in cases like this is not to review the merits of a dismissal, but to determine whether the employee was accorded his statutory and procedural rights. See Hargett v. Summerfield, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 243 F.2d 29. Such rights were fully accorded here.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Mueller

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 23, 1960
280 F.2d 722 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Ellis v. Mueller

Case Details

Full title:Hazel T. ELLIS, Appellant, v. Frederick H. MUELLER, Acting Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1960

Citations

280 F.2d 722 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
108 U.S. App. D.C. 174

Citing Cases

Charlton v. United States

Thus, where procedural requirements havebeen complied with, the Court should not inquire into the merits of…

Williams v. Zuckert

The failure of the Air Force to produce such witnesses here can in no way be viewed as a denial of…