From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliot v. Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1895
21 S.E. 106 (N.C. 1895)

Opinion

(February Term, 1895).

Practice — Appeal from Judgment for Costs.

Where nothing is involved except costs, an appeal will not be allowed.

PROCEEDINGS under section 1756 of The Code, commenced before the clerk of the Superior Court of PITT, to settle a controversy between a landlord and a tenant, and heard on appeal before Bynum, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1894, of Pitt Superior Court. The defendant appealed.

J. B. Batchelor and T. J. Jarvis for plaintiff.

Shepherd Busbee for defendant.


In this action the parties settled their matters by paying and receiving from each other, according to the contract. At the conclusion of the trial the court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for costs only, and the defendant appealed. When nothing is involved except costs, an appeal will not be allowed. Clark's Code, 560; Futrell v. Deans, ante, 38. When the subject matter of the action has been lost, destroyed or adjusted between the parties, an appeal will not be allowed for costs only. (185) S. v. Byrd, 93 N.C. 624.

Cited: S. c., 117 N.C. 114; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438.


Summaries of

Elliot v. Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1895
21 S.E. 106 (N.C. 1895)
Case details for

Elliot v. Tyson

Case Details

Full title:L. P. ELLIOT v. G. T. TYSON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1895

Citations

21 S.E. 106 (N.C. 1895)
116 N.C. 184

Citing Cases

State v. Byrd

Error. Reversed. Cited: Coy v. Lassiter, 94 N.C. 132; Brooks v. Austin, 94 N.C. 224; Tatom v. White, 95 N.C.…

Springs v. Scott

To the suggestion that his proceeding invoking the equitable powers of the court should have been instituted…