From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellentuck v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1975
48 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

May 13, 1975


In an action, inter alia, to declare the proposed alteration of a building a violation of a zoning resolution, plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 27, 1974 which denied plaintiffs' motion to punish respondents H.I. Sigman, as Borough Superintendent of the Borough of Queens, and Kimball Construction Co., Inc., for contempt of court and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated January 8, 1975, as granted leave to renew the prior motion insofar as it concerned respondent Kimball Construction Co., Inc., and, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination. In their brief, plaintiffs request that the motion to punish respondent Sigman "be marked withdrawn without prejudice." Appeal from the order dated November 27, 1974 dismissed, without costs, insofar as it denied the motion to punish defendant Kimball. That portion of the order was superseded by the order of January 8, 1975. Order of November 27, 1974 otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order of January 8, 1975, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ellentuck v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1975
48 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Ellentuck v. Stein

Case Details

Full title:IRVING ELLENTUCK et al., Appellants, v. JOSEPH STEIN, as Commissioner of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Ellentuck v. Klein

The claim that Sigman delayed in requesting revocation of the certificate of occupancy after the initial…