From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black Elk v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 22, 2019
Civil No. 18-3255 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 22, 2019)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-3255 (DWF/LIB)

02-22-2019

Austin Black Elk, Michael Dewayne Perseke, Michael Whipple, Shannon D. Hollie, Mark Dunker, Gary Spikcer, Rodney Thundercloud, Thomas Milton, Justin Jacobson, August Kingbird, Nick Olson, Guy I. Green, Jamie Allen Andrews, Terrance L. Holliday, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas Roy; Emily Johnson Piper; Nancy Johnston;, Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General; Minnesota Sentencing Commission; and/or Jane and John Does, in their official and individually [sic] capacities, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated February 5, 2019. (Doc. No. 8.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's February 8, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [8]) is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiffs Michael Dewayne Perseke, Michael Whipple, Shannon D. Hollie, Mark Dunker, Gary Spicer, Rodney Thundercloud, Thomas Milton, Justin Jacobson, August Kingbird, Nick Olson, Guy I. Green, Jamie Allen Andrews, and Terrance L. Holliday are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action.

3. Thirteen separate new proceedings shall be initiated, one each for Plaintiffs Michael Dewayne Perseke, Michael Whipple, Shannon D. Hollie, Mark Dunker, Gary Spicer, Rodney Thundercloud, Thomas Milton, Justin Jacobson, August Kingbird, Nick Olson, Guy I. Green, Jamie Allen Andrews, and Terrance L. Holliday.

4. The Complaint, (Doc. No. [1]), used to initiate this action shall be used to initiate the separate actions;

5. Each of the fourteen Plaintiffs shall file an amended pleading that presents their individual claims specifically as they related to that individual Plaintiff.

6. Each of the fourteen individual Plaintiffs shall submit a new individualized application to proceed in forma pauperis in their individualized action.

7. A copy of this Order adopting this Report and Recommendation shall be filed in the present case, as well as, each of the new individualized actions. Dated: February 22, 2019

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Black Elk v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 22, 2019
Civil No. 18-3255 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Black Elk v. Roy

Case Details

Full title:Austin Black Elk, Michael Dewayne Perseke, Michael Whipple, Shannon D…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 22, 2019

Citations

Civil No. 18-3255 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 22, 2019)

Citing Cases

Wiley v. McAllister

Anderson v. California, No. 10 CV 2216 MMA AJB, 2010 WL 4316996, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2010); cf. Black…

Thomas v. Mattingly

Anderson v. California, No. 10 CV 2216 MMA AJB, 2010 WL 4316996, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2010); cf. Black…