From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elisaul A. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Jayden A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2018
159 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6075

03-22-2018

IN RE JAYDEN A., and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Elisaul A., Respondent–Appellant, Nancy C., Respondent, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kathy C. Park of counsel), for respondent. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the children.


Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kathy C. Park of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the children.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kahn, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about August 29, 2016, which found that respondent father had neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 368, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 [2004] ). The evidence shows that the father knew or should have known about the mother's long-standing and serious mental health problems, and put the children at imminent risk of harm when he ignored the agency's directives and exposed the children to the mother immediately following her release from the hospital (see Matter of Toussaint E. [Angeline M.], 151 A.D.3d 417, 52 N.Y.S.3d 859 [1st Dept. 2017] ). Even crediting the father's testimony, he left the children with the mother's adult daughter in the mother's home, where the mother could easily access them, despite the agency's directive not to leave the children with the mother's relatives. Furthermore, the record shows that the mother was spending time with the children since the agency caseworker overheard the children's voices while speaking with the mother on the telephone. The father's actions would have amounted to neglect even if they had not resulted in a violation of the court's temporary order of protection barring the mother from having contact with the children.


Summaries of

Elisaul A. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Jayden A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2018
159 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Elisaul A. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Jayden A.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAYDEN A., and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
71 N.Y.S.3d 508

Citing Cases

In re Christian G.

Since the father failed to establish at the fact-finding hearing that he was voluntarily and regularly…

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Alexis G. (In re Christian G.)

Since the father failed to establish at the fact-finding hearing that he was voluntarily and regularly…