From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisenberg v. Rockland County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2005
19 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-08547.

June 20, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Meir Orenstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated August 23, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs' motion, in effect, for prejudgment interest from the date that the plaintiffs were granted summary judgment on the issue of liability against him.

John C. Buratti, Yonkers, N.Y. (Philip M. Aglietti of counsel), for appellant.

Subin Associates, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Herbert S. Subin and Alexander Roytblat of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion, in effect, for pre-judgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5002 from the date of the order granting them summary judgment on the issue of liability against the appellant ( see Love v. State of New York, 78 NY2d 540).


Summaries of

Eisenberg v. Rockland County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2005
19 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Eisenberg v. Rockland County

Case Details

Full title:BORUCH EISENBERG et al., Respondents, v. ROCKLAND COUNTY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

Van Nostrand v. Froehlich

When trials are bifurcated, prejudgment interest is computed from the date of the liability finding ( see…

Miraglia v. Essex Ins. Co.

Id. See also,Van Nostrand v. Froehlich , 44 AD3d 54, 844 NYS2d 293 (2nd Dept., 2007);Eisenberg v. Rockland…