From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 19, 2013
77 A.3d 271 (Del. 2013)

Opinion

No. 280 2013.

2013-09-19

E.I. DU PONT De NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Plaintiff Below/Appellant, v. MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Defendant Below/Appellee.


Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, C.A. No. N10C–09–058.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER


MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

This 19th day of September 2013, the Court having carefully considered the briefs of the parties and their contentions in oral argument, has determined as follows that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned decision dated April 24, 2013.

To the extent that the issues raised on appeal are related to the trial judge's finding that DuPont is not entitled to additional royalties under the PACRA, the trial judge's conclusion is affirmed. For the reason set forth above, the Court need not reach the trial judge's determination that the statute of limitations barred any claim that DuPont may have had.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 19, 2013
77 A.3d 271 (Del. 2013)
Case details for

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:E.I. DU PONT De NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Plaintiff Below/Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Sep 19, 2013

Citations

77 A.3d 271 (Del. 2013)

Citing Cases

Serviz, Inc. v. The ServiceMaster Co.

Super. Ct. Apr. 24, 2013), aff'd sub nom. E.I. Du Pont Nemours & Co. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., 77 A.3d 271…

Schatzman v. Modern Controls, Inc.

Auriga Cap. Corp. v. Gatz Properties, 40 A.3d 839, 880-81 (Del. Ch. 2012), judgment entered sub nom. Auriga…