From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EGER v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

May, 1923.


Judgment and order reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, because of error in the charge of the trial court at folios 394, 395, and the refusal to charge at folios 398-400. ( Vanderborg v. City of New York, 158 App. Div. 297.) Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Kelly, P.J., dissents upon the ground that a question of fact was presented as to defendant's negligence. ( Moshier v. City of New York, 190 App. Div. 111, and cases cited.)


Summaries of

EGER v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

EGER v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE A. EGER, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Town of Harrison

The judgment means that all the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of miles of sidewalks in this State…