holding no special relationship existing between a parolee and his parole officer by which to create a duty on the officer to warn others about the parolee's status or propensities
Summary of this case from Lamb v. StateNo. 98-381.
November 2, 1998.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 134 F. 3d 361.
holding no special relationship existing between a parolee and his parole officer by which to create a duty on the officer to warn others about the parolee's status or propensities
Summary of this case from Lamb v. StateFull title:EGAN v. ATHOL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 2, 1998
See (some discussed below) P.A. Bergner Co. v. Bank One, Milwaukee, N.A. (In re P.A. Bergner Co.), 140 F.3d…
Harter v. United StatesDoc. 25 at 9.Gragg v. Wichita State Univ. , 261 Kan. 1037, 934 P.2d 121, 128 (1997) ; see also, e.g.,South ex…