From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Efremov v. Motorsport Network, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 15, 2023
357 So. 3d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Summary

concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to amend the complaint where, in the last weeks before the summary judgment hearing, Appellant sought to add multiple counts maintaining that the contract provisions he had relied upon in the litigation up to that point in time did not reflect the parties’ intent and must be reformed on account of mutual or unilateral mistake

Summary of this case from State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cent. Therapy Ctr.

Opinion

No. 3D22-138.

02-15-2023

Yavor EFREMOV, Appellant, v. MOTORSPORT NETWORK, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Clarke Silverglate, P.A., and Craig Salner and Karen H. Curtis , for appellant. AXS Law Group, PLLC, and Jeffrey W. Gutchess , for appellee. Before LOGUE, SCALES, and BOKOR, JJ.


Clarke Silverglate, P.A., and Craig Salner and Karen H. Curtis , for appellant.

AXS Law Group, PLLC, and Jeffrey W. Gutchess , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court's determination that the contract terms at issue warranted the granting of the Appellee's motion for summary judgment. Shivdasani v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 306 So.3d 1156, 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) ("Courts cannot disregard ... agreed-upon, contractual provisions between parties. To do so would be to strike the ... obligations from the contract by way of judicial fiat and the bargained-for contractual terms would be rendered surplusage.").

In addition, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion to amend its complaint. In the last weeks before the summary judgment hearing, Appellant sought to add counts maintaining that the contract provisions he had relied upon in the litigation up to that point in time did not reflect the parties' intent and must be reformed on account of mutual or unilateral mistake. The trial court properly found that the amendment would be both untimely and futile. Vella v. Salaues, 290 So.3d 946, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). Accordingly, we affirm the well-reasoned judgment of the trial court.


Summaries of

Efremov v. Motorsport Network, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 15, 2023
357 So. 3d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to amend the complaint where, in the last weeks before the summary judgment hearing, Appellant sought to add multiple counts maintaining that the contract provisions he had relied upon in the litigation up to that point in time did not reflect the parties’ intent and must be reformed on account of mutual or unilateral mistake

Summary of this case from State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cent. Therapy Ctr.
Case details for

Efremov v. Motorsport Network, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Yavor EFREMOV, Appellant, v. MOTORSPORT NETWORK, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

357 So. 3d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cent. Therapy Ctr.

On the specific facts before us, we cannot find that the trial court abused its discretion. See Randle v.…