From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Effertz v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 30, 2008
Case No. 08-1061-WEB (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 08-1061-WEB.

October 30, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT


Plaintiff seeks review of the Defendant's denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Reid for a recommendation and report pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Now before the Court is the Recommendation and Report of Magistrate Judge Reid. (Doc. 13). Neither party has filed a written objection.

The Magistrate Judge found the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) should be affirmed. The Magistrate Judge found there was substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusions of the ALJ that plaintiff did not have a severe mental impairment. Therefore, there was no error by the ALJ in his evaluation.

Therefore it is ORDERED that the Recommendation and Report (Doc. 13) be adopted by the Court.

It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Effertz v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 30, 2008
Case No. 08-1061-WEB (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Effertz v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS H. EFFERTZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

Case No. 08-1061-WEB (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Chaddock v. Colvin

And we find that the ALJ's reasoning has been upheld in other cases. See Creed v. Astrue, 2010 WL 2520087 *4…