From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Bynum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 16, 1914
141 P. 678 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 5497

Opinion Filed June 16, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Review — Dismissal. (Syllabus in St. L. S. F. R. Co. v. Nelson, 40 Okla. 143, 136 P. 590, is made the syllabus in this case.)

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge.

Action by James H. Bynum and others against W. S. Edwards and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. Dismissed.

Clayton Clayton, for plaintiffs in error.

Matthews Rosenwinkel, for defendants in error.


This cause was tried in the district court of Pittsburg county, and judgment was rendered and entered on February 25, 1913. On February 28, 1913, defendants filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled on March 21, 1913; whereupon they were granted 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. For the reason that the filing of said motion was a vain thing, and plaintiffs in error did not prepare and serve a case-made within the three days allowed by statute from the rendition of the judgment, the appeal is dismissed. St. L. S. F. R. Co. v. Nelson, 40 Okla. 143, 136 P. 590; C., R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 728, 136 P. 591.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Bynum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 16, 1914
141 P. 678 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Edwards v. Bynum

Case Details

Full title:EDWARDS et al. v. BYNUM et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 16, 1914

Citations

141 P. 678 (Okla. 1914)
141 P. 678

Citing Cases

Pope v. Pope

Therefore, the writ of error must be dismissed as being prematurely brought to this court. Code (Ann. Supp.),…