From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ed Hull v. Little

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2021
CV 21-05297 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CV 21-05297 PA (PDx)

11-01-2021

ED HULL, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM LITTLE, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Percy Anderson, United States District Judge.

In accordance with the Court's November 1, 2021 Order granting the Application for Default Judgment filed by plaintiff Ed Hull (“Plaintiff”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. Plaintiff shall have judgment in his favor and against defendant William Little (“Defendant”); and

2. Defendant is ordered to provide accessible exterior paths of travel, accessible ramps, accessible parking, and an access aisle with compliant signage at the property located at 11010 S. Prairie Avenue, Inglewood California, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Standards.


Summaries of

Ed Hull v. Little

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2021
CV 21-05297 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Ed Hull v. Little

Case Details

Full title:ED HULL, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM LITTLE, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2021

Citations

CV 21-05297 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)

Citing Cases

Machowski v. 333 N. Placentia Prop.

This also appears to be the construction of the Central District's rules adopted by a number of its judges.…