From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckert v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Summary

affirming grant of summary judgment for state where plaintiff was injured when police failed to light road flares at the scene of an accident, but applying special relationship test

Summary of this case from Denis v. Town of Haverstraw

Opinion

2003-02146, 2003-02147.

Decided January 12, 2004.

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the claimants appeal from (1) a decision of the Court of Claims (Mignano, J.), dated February 6, 2003, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated February 25, 2003, which, after a trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the claim.

Larkin, Axelrod, Trachte Tetenbaum, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. (Adam Garth of counsel), for appellants.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Patrick J. Walsh of counsel; Nina E. Choi on the brief), for respondent.

Before: THOMAS A. ADAMS and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The claimants allege, among other things, that the State of New York was negligent in having its police officers fail to replace extinguished road flares at the scene of an accident, and failed to take other reasonable measures to warn drivers of the accident. However, traffic regulation, including the placement of road flares, "is a classic example of a governmental function undertaken for the protection and safety of the public pursuant to the general police powers" ( Balsam v. Delma Eng'g Corp., 90 N.Y.2d 966, 968; see Respass v. City of New York, 288 A.D.2d 286; Gonzalez v. County of Suffolk, 228 A.D.2d 411).

It is well settled that a municipality cannot be held liable for negligence in the performance of a governmental function unless a special relationship exists between the municipality and the injured party ( see Balsam v. Delma Eng'g Corp., supra at 967; Cuffy v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 255, 260). Here, the injured claimant failed to establish the existence of a special relationship between himself and the State. Accordingly, the claim was properly dismissed.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eckert v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

affirming grant of summary judgment for state where plaintiff was injured when police failed to light road flares at the scene of an accident, but applying special relationship test

Summary of this case from Denis v. Town of Haverstraw
Case details for

Eckert v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ECKERT, ET AL., appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 12, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 132

Citing Cases

Peters v. City of New York

Peters and Cowan further contend that the EMS workers, in violation of the guidelines set forth in the…

Santoro v. City of New York

The alleged negligence of the defendant City of New York consisted of its purported failure to properly…