From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eberle v. Mehrbach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1874
55 N.Y. 682 (N.Y. 1874)

Summary

In Eberle v. Mehrbach, 55 N.Y. 682, a contract for the sale of a house on Sunday was held not to be in violation of the statute, and "evidence that defendants were in the habit of exposing horses for sale was held immaterial, as the question was simply as to what was the character of the particular transaction."

Summary of this case from Eden Musee American Co. v. Bingham

Opinion

Argued January 26, 1874

Decided February 3, 1874

Samuel Hand for the appellants.

Mr. Moore for the respondent.


CHURCH, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Eberle v. Mehrbach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1874
55 N.Y. 682 (N.Y. 1874)

In Eberle v. Mehrbach, 55 N.Y. 682, a contract for the sale of a house on Sunday was held not to be in violation of the statute, and "evidence that defendants were in the habit of exposing horses for sale was held immaterial, as the question was simply as to what was the character of the particular transaction."

Summary of this case from Eden Musee American Co. v. Bingham
Case details for

Eberle v. Mehrbach

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EBERLE, Respondent, v . ISAAC MEHRBACH et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 3, 1874

Citations

55 N.Y. 682 (N.Y. 1874)

Citing Cases

State v. Fass

" A private, casual contract or sale on Sunday was not invalidated thereby, at least if it did not violate or…

Rodman v. Robinson

o. App. 656; Sanders v. Johnson, 29 Ga. 526; Dorough v. Mort. Co., 118 Ga. 178; Ray v. Cattel, 51 Ky. 532;…