Eaton v. Village of South Orange

Full title: FRANK B. EATON, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 18, 1926

134 A. 917 (N.J. 1926)

103 N.J.L. 182

Opinion

Argued May 20, 1926 —

Decided October 18, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 956.

For the appellants, Riker Riker.

For the respondent, Howe Davis.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.