From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaton Corporation v. ZF Meritor LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 16, 2006
Case No. 03-74844 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 03-74844.

August 16, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order [Docket #79]. For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 15, 2006, Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. Plaintiff's request to redact customer identification information, third party identification information from its sales, pricing, rebate and discount agreements and documents is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff's request to redact pricing, discount or rebate information for clutches, axles and brakes is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff's request to limit production of the discovery at issue to Defendant's outside counsel and retained consultants and/or experts is GRANTED. None of the factual material so produced shall be provided or communicated to Defendant's in-house counsel or other employees. Said discovery shall in all other respects be subject to the protective order entered on September 14, 2005

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eaton Corporation v. ZF Meritor LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 16, 2006
Case No. 03-74844 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Eaton Corporation v. ZF Meritor LLC

Case Details

Full title:EATON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ZF MERITOR LLC., ARVINMERITOR INC., and…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 16, 2006

Citations

Case No. 03-74844 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 16, 2006)

Citing Cases

Stockley v. Nissan of N. Am., Inc.

With a conventional transmission, this talk of “gears” is literal; the transmission system contains a…

Simpson v. Nissan of N. Am., Inc.

” See Eaton Corp. v. ZF Meritor LLC, No. 03-74844, 2006 WL 6209926, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 14,…