From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eastern Sav. Bank v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2004
3 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06257.

Decided January 26, 2004.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Israel Drillick appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated June 6, 2003, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated March 13, 2003, denying that branch of his prior motion which was to vacate the plaintiff's jury demand

Donald Tirschwell, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

Delbello Donnellan Weingarten Tartaglia Wise Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Evan Wiederkehr of counsel), for respondent.

Before: WILLIAM F. MASTRO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

After the plaintiff commenced the instant mortgage foreclosure action, the defendant Israel Drillick asserted in his amended answer, inter alia, that the subject mortgage was void as against his earlier recorded deed for the purchase of a portion of the subject property pursuant to Real Property Law § 291. Drillick then moved, inter alia, to vacate the plaintiff's jury demand The Supreme Court denied that branch of Drillick's motion which was to vacate the plaintiff's jury demand, finding that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial with respect to Drillick's statutory defense. Drillick then moved for leave to reargue the denial of that branch of the motion which was to vacate the plaintiff's jury demand The Supreme Court granted reargument, and upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Contrary to Drillick's contention, the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial since the dispute between Drillick and the plaintiff involved competing claims to real property ( see Cilwick v. Camelo, 55 A.D.2d 782) and Drillick's affirmative defense asserting of Real Property Law § 291 was not incidental to the mortgage foreclosure ( cf. R.C.P.S. Assocs. v. Karam Developers, 213 A.D.2d 612; April M's Enters. v. Scott, 178 A.D.2d 572).

ALTMAN, J.P., COZIER, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eastern Sav. Bank v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2004
3 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Eastern Sav. Bank v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB, respondent, v. SARA M. STERN, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 641

Citing Cases

Paciello v. Graffeo

A jury trial is guaranteed in an action "for determination of a claim to real property under article fifteen…

Burns v. Burns

" (Paciello, supra. at 544 quoting CPLR 4101 [2]). "The plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial since [the…