From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easley v. Bauer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 29, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv37 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 29, 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding a waiver where the plaintiff was an experienced pro se litigant and had filed at least ten other cases

Summary of this case from Brown v. Mason
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

Case Number: 1:07cv37.

February 29, 2008

ORDER

SUSAN DLOTT, District Judge

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 22, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and this case is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Summaries of

Easley v. Bauer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 29, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv37 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 29, 2008)

finding a waiver where the plaintiff was an experienced pro se litigant and had filed at least ten other cases

Summary of this case from Brown v. Mason

barring federal claims under Leaman because the pro se plaintiff was "an experienced litigant" who had filed as many as ten other pro se federal civil actions, including one in which he presented evidence and arguments in a jury trial

Summary of this case from Pullen v. Combs

barring federal claims under Leaman because the pro se plaintiff was "an experienced litigant" who had filed as many as ten other pro se federal civil actions, including one in which he presented evidence and arguments in a jury trial

Summary of this case from Pullen v. Combs

barring federal claims under Leaman because pro se plaintiff was "an experienced litigant" who had filed as many as ten other pro se federal civil actions, including one in which he presented evidence and arguments in a jury trial

Summary of this case from Park v. Holdren

barring federal claims under Leaman because pro se plaintiff was "an experienced litigant" who had filed as many as ten other pro se federal civil actions, including one in which he presented evidence and arguments in a jury trial

Summary of this case from Alford v. Mohr

barring federal claims under Leaman because pro se plaintiff had filed as many as ten other pro se federal civil actions, including one in which he presented evidence and arguments in a jury trial, and thus was an experienced litigant

Summary of this case from Easley v. Cooper
Case details for

Easley v. Bauer

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EASLEY, Plaintiff(s) v. CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM BAUER et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:07cv37 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Weir v. Mohr

In making this factual finding, a district court considers the pro se plaintiff's litigation experience, the…

Park v. Holdren

A knowing and voluntarily waiver of the right to proceed with federal claims when filing suit in the Ohio…

14 Citing Cases