From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easler v. United States

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 15, 2023
1:19-CR-00049-LEW (D. Me. Sep. 15, 2023)

Summary

In Easler v. United States, 2023 WL 4868278, at *2 (D. Maine, Sept. 15, 2023), the court stated: “the only basis for equitable tolling that Petitioner mentioned was “sporadic lockdowns” resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Summary of this case from Cruz-Rivera v. United States

Opinion

1:19-CR-00049-LEW

09-15-2023

DANIEL EASLER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

LANCE E. WALKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 31, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the petition filed by Daniel Easler pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The time within which to file objections expired on August 22, 2023, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is Affirmed and Adopted. The Petitioner's motion for habeas relief and a certificate of appealability are denied.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Easler v. United States

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 15, 2023
1:19-CR-00049-LEW (D. Me. Sep. 15, 2023)

In Easler v. United States, 2023 WL 4868278, at *2 (D. Maine, Sept. 15, 2023), the court stated: “the only basis for equitable tolling that Petitioner mentioned was “sporadic lockdowns” resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Summary of this case from Cruz-Rivera v. United States
Case details for

Easler v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL EASLER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Sep 15, 2023

Citations

1:19-CR-00049-LEW (D. Me. Sep. 15, 2023)

Citing Cases

Cruz-Rivera v. United States

In Easler v. United States, 2023 WL 4868278, at *2 (D. Maine, Sept. 15, 2023), the court stated: “the…