From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E-Lynxx Corp. v. Innerworkings, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2015
592 F. App'x 947 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Summary

concluding that "receiving" an electronic communication is a function that may be performed by any general purpose computer and required no specific algorithm, but functions related to the organization and association of vendors with buyers required the disclosure of an algorithm because vendor data could be organized according to myriad criteria

Summary of this case from EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.

Opinion

2014-1349

02-09-2015

E-LYNXX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INNERWORKINGS, INC., CIRQIT.COM, INC., Defendants-Appellees

DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARK STRACHAN; JONATHAN TAD SUDER, BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX. DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. Also represented by ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC; JENNIFER H. DOAN, JOSHUA R. THANE, Haltom & Doan, Texarkana, TX. JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also represented by JESSICA MENDEZ, RICHARD L. BROPHY.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 1:10-cv-02535-CCC, Chief Judge Christopher Conner.

JUDGMENT

DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARK STRACHAN; JONATHAN TAD SUDER, BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX. DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. Also represented by ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC; JENNIFER H. DOAN, JOSHUA R. THANE, Haltom & Doan, Texarkana, TX. JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also represented by JESSICA MENDEZ, RICHARD L. BROPHY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

E-Lynxx Corp. v. Innerworkings, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2015
592 F. App'x 947 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

concluding that "receiving" an electronic communication is a function that may be performed by any general purpose computer and required no specific algorithm, but functions related to the organization and association of vendors with buyers required the disclosure of an algorithm because vendor data could be organized according to myriad criteria

Summary of this case from EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
Case details for

E-Lynxx Corp. v. Innerworkings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:E-LYNXX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INNERWORKINGS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2015

Citations

592 F. App'x 947 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

SoftView LLC v. United States

This court summarily affirmed. SoftView LLC v. Kyocera Corp., 592 F. App'x 947 (Fed. Cir. 2015). The IPR…

EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.

Nothing suggests that receiving messages from the non-email sources is coextensive with the structure of a…