From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dynasty Props., LLC v. U.S. Bank

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 3, 2019
272 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-389

04-03-2019

DYNASTY PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Bruce Botsford (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant/cross-appellee. Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee) and William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee/cross-appellant.


Bruce Botsford (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant/cross-appellee.

Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee) and William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fogarty v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 224 So.3d 313, 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (quoting Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Serv., Inc., 153 So.3d 280, 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("In a typical foreclosure case, the plaintiff proves the amount of indebtedness through the testimony of a competent witness who can authenticate the mortgagee's business records and confirm that they accurately reflect the amount owed on the mortgage.") ); Wachovia Mortg., F.S.B. v. Goodwill, 199 So.3d 346, 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (holding plaintiff "presented legally sufficient evidence on the amount of damages" by introducing the payment history stating the principal balance and its witnesses' testimony confirming the payment history was accurate).


Summaries of

Dynasty Props., LLC v. U.S. Bank

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 3, 2019
272 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Dynasty Props., LLC v. U.S. Bank

Case Details

Full title:Dynasty Properties, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. U.S. Bank, N.A.…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

Citations

272 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)