Summary
In Dye v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, No. 90,699, 2004 WL 720118, unpublished opinion filed April 2, 2004, a panel of this court found that there was substantial compliance where the officer placed the advisory form in front of and between Dye and the officer, and the officer allowed his finger to travel across the document as he read it to Dye. The panel noted that Dye did not physically possess the form before she refused the test; the form was placed with Dye's property at the jail.
Summary of this case from Thompson v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueOpinion
No. 90,699.
April 2, 2004.
Appeal from the Sedgwick.
Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.