From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dye v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2015
2:12-cv-02201 TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2015)

Opinion

          BARRY MORRIS, Attorney at Law, Walnut Creek, CA, Attorney for Petitioner, WILLIAM R. DYE.

          DAVID ELDRIDGE, Attorney for Respondent.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between BARRY MORRIS, attorney for petitioner, WILLIAN R. DYE, and DAVID EDLRIDGEE, attorney for respondent FRED FOULK, that time to file objections to the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations be extended sixty days up to and including November 8, 2015. This stipulation is based upon the attached declaration of BARRY MORRIS.

         Declaration of Barry Morris

         I, BARRY MORRIS, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

         1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all the courts of the State of California, the United States District Court for the Northern, Central, and Eastern Districts of California, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court. I represent the petitioner in the above-entitled action;

         2. I am making this request because, in the vernacular, I am slammed with work. I have four briefs to finish in the next two weeks: [1] a reply brief in United States v. Hunt, 13-10583, a complicated case with seven issues where the opening brief was 70 pages, [2] the opening brief in United States v. Head, No. 14-10438, a complicated mortgage fraud case with a record exceeding 1, 700 pages, [3] an amended habeas petition in Ayala v. Lewis, C 11-05708-YGR, a homicide case, and [4] a response to a motion for summary judgment in Dewey v. Monterey County, No. M114120, a §1983 case.

         3. On September 25th, I am leaving for a two week, pre-paid vacation with my son in China. Hence the reason for this request.

         4. I have spoken to counsel for respondent and he has no objection to this request.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, it is hereby ordered that the time to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge is hereby extended up to and including November 8, 2015.


Summaries of

Dye v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2015
2:12-cv-02201 TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Dye v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. DYE, Petitioner, v. FRED FOULK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2015

Citations

2:12-cv-02201 TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2015)