From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duwenhoegger v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 30, 2012
CIVIL NO. 10-3965 (PJS/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 10-3965 (PJS/JSM)

04-30-2012

JERRY J. DUWENHOEGGER, SR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN KING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated February 13, 2012. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order [Docket No. 50] is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order [Docket No. 51] is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment [Docket No. 78] is DENIED; and

4. Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order [Docket No. 88] is DENIED.

______________________

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Duwenhoegger v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 30, 2012
CIVIL NO. 10-3965 (PJS/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Duwenhoegger v. King

Case Details

Full title:JERRY J. DUWENHOEGGER, SR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN KING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 10-3965 (PJS/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 30, 2012)

Citing Cases

Waldorf v. Dayton

This argument is without merit; courts have repeatedly rejected similar sovereign citizenship arguments. See,…

Minnesota v. Barry

The Court notes that even if Barry sought to file a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and not a…