From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durham v. Vail Corporation

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 11, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02443-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 11, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02443-ZLW-CBS.

June 11, 2008


ORDER


The matters before the Court are the Motion To Withdraw By Buchanan, Jurdem Cederberg, P.C. and the Entry Of Appearance by Ross Buchanan. Mr. Buchanan has represented Plaintiff since this action was commenced; however, his law firm is dissolving and he has formed a new firm. Mr. Buchanan states that he will continue to represent Plaintiff at his new firm. No withdrawal or entry of appearance is required under these circumstances, because it is the attorney, not the law firm, who represents the party, and Plaintiff's attorney of record (Mr. Buchanan) is not withdrawing. Accordingly, it is

See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3B ("An attorney's entry of appearance by signing a pleading, motion, or other paper does not constitute entry of appearance by that attorney's firm.").

ORDERED that the Entry Of Appearance (Doc. No. 24) shall be construed as a notice of new firm and address change for Plaintiff's counsel. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion To Withdraw By Buchanan, Jurdem Cederberg, P.C. (Doc. No. 23) is stricken.


Summaries of

Durham v. Vail Corporation

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 11, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02443-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Durham v. Vail Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LARRY DURHAM, Plaintiff, v. THE VAIL CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02443-ZLW-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 11, 2008)