From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duracell Int'l, Inc. v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1992
187 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


Plaintiff seeks defense and indemnification from defendant insurance companies in three underlying tort actions brought against it. The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion to regulate pre-trial discovery. Here, in view of defendant-appellant's failure to comply with the terms of the court's previous order regulating discovery and a stipulation among the parties, it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying the relief sought by defendant-appellant. (Boutique Fabrice v Bergdorf Goodman, 129 A.D.2d 529.)

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Duracell Int'l, Inc. v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1992
187 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Duracell Int'l, Inc. v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DURACELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Respondent, v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 438

Citing Cases

James v. Harriet Tubman Gardens Apartment Corp.

See, Duracell International v. American Employers' Ins. Co., 187 A.D.2d 278 (1st Dep't 1992). CPLR §3103(a)…

In re Elyachar

As set forth above, Alice and Dana now move to compel. The trial court has broad discretion to supervise and…