From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Atlantic City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 13, 1939
3 A.2d 583 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1938 —

Decided January 13, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 120 N.J.L. 141.

For the appellant, Carroll Taylor.

For the respondent, Gaskill Rosenberg.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Atlantic City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 13, 1939
3 A.2d 583 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Dunn v. Atlantic City

Case Details

Full title:MARY A. DUNN, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 13, 1939

Citations

3 A.2d 583 (N.J. 1939)
3 A.2d 583

Citing Cases

Rugg v. Driwood Corp.

R.S. 34:15-12(x). Our negative answer to this question is, in our opinion, controlled by the case of Dunn v.…

Conquy v. New Jersey Power Light Co.

And where, as here, that testimony is in conflict, it is reasonable to give greater weight to the testimony…